Cocktail Marketing's Blog

Posts Tagged ‘Advertising

Éste es un artículo por Abbey Klaassen @ adage.com

Microsoft has long built enterprise software solutions for myriad industries: retail, health care, sales. But now it has its eye on advertising.

The software company and Mediabrands, the media division of Interpublic Group of Cos. that counts Microsoft as a major ad client, are collaborating to build a software system that marketers can use to track everything from search advertising and e-mail newsletters to CRM systems to TV buys in one place.

The logic is that too many of the tools used today to analyze and execute those various marketing functions don’t «talk» with one another, which creates inefficiencies and clouds decision-making. Microsoft’s goal is to create a single platform to do so.

«We haven’t had the Office Suite, a productivity suite, for marketing» that fits marketing-management systems into a larger intelligent platform, said Quentin George, chief digital officer at Mediabrands. He went on: «Donovan [Data Systems] does billing and reconciliation, another group does planning tools, another group does asset management. And we spend a lot of time and effort stitching those together. … This is the first time we’ve had a platform player like Microsoft actively going out and saying ‘We think this is a software challenge and all sorts of these elements can be deployed in a far more synchronized way.'»

Holy grail for marketers
Microsoft and Mediabrands are calling the software platform the Media Operations Management System — and they’re certainly not underselling what they envision the final product to be. The announcement touts it as «intended to reinvent the way media is planned, purchased, measured, reported and optimized.» And Scott Howe, corporate VP of Microsoft’s advertiser and publisher solutions group, likened the effect of the yet-to-be-implemented platform to that of the first investment bank to use a spreadsheet instead of calculators and slide rules. He said the visibility they’re going to provide is the holy grail for marketers.

Actual implementation remains a ways away. Microsoft said it’ll be turning on pieces of the platform from now to the end of the year; Mediabrands said it plans to take the offer to clients by year’s end and that the timeline for it being built depends entirely on clients.

«We haven’t built the system and you can’t build a system until you sit down with a client,» said Mr. George. When asked whether he thought Microsoft might be Mediabrands’ first client to use it, he said who the first client is remains to be seen, and that there is a separation between Microsoft the marketing organization and Microsoft the online-advertising organization.

For Microsoft the money-making organization, building out an enterprise business for advertising is a revenue opportunity in a couple of ways. First, there’s the direct revenue it could get from licensing more software to the ad industry. Second, «as we develop more collaborative long-term relationships with major partners, there’s a chance that by doing so that could lead to up-selling of other Microsoft products and services,» said Mr. Howe. He insisted that there’s no conflict of interest in this because the insights such a software platform could give marketers on where to put their ad dollars will be driven by ROI «and we won’t be defining those standards.»

More platforms to come?
Incidentally, the platform may be another sign of Microsoft’s ongoing business rivalry with Google, which has spoken of building out a brand «dashboard.» At an Interactive Advertising Bureau annual meeting in March 2008, then-head of Microsoft’s advertiser and publisher solutions, Brian McAndrews, told the crowd there would probably be two major ad platforms in the future and that Microsoft would be one of them. (You can guess who the other might be.)

Mr. Howe said that this is indeed the platform Microsoft has envisioned, but that he’s not sure there will only be two. He thinks Microsoft’s own offering will look different depending on who’s using it and what kinds of ways they want to customize it.

•    El incremento en la demanda de oficinas virtuales continúa, mientras las empresas exploran nuevos mercados.

•    Cuando una situación impide estar en el centro de trabajo, la oficina virtual permite continuar con las actividades laborales en todo momento.

Los negocios con plena visión del futuro, no esperan a que las cosas mejoren por sí mismas. Ellos amplían sus horizontes al explorar nuevos mercados. Grupo Regus, proveedor líder a nivel global de soluciones para centros de trabajo, continúa viendo un marcado incremento en ventas de espacios de Oficinas Virtuales, con más de 50,000 compañías alrededor del mundo que aprovechan actualmente las ventajas que acarrean las soluciones Regus.

“El incremento en la demanda de Oficinas Virtuales se ve estimulado por mercados que se van cerrando, así como en las restricciones en la expansión de capital como resultado de la recesión”,  comentó Cati Cerda, Directora General de Regus México. “Las compañías aún se deben expandir para crear novedad e incrementar los ingresos brutos. La Oficina Virtual es una de las herramientas que han seleccionado para explorar esos mercados y obtener el crecimiento necesario para enfrentar de la recesión”.

En contra del actual fondo de flujo económico, es crucial que las compañías grandes y pequeñas se enfoquen en buscar nuevas oportunidades a la par de mantenerse ágiles y lograr un firme agarre en el control del dinero. Una Oficina Virtual está probando ser popular debido a que le ofrece a las firmas una presencia local en nuevos mercados, sin hacer inversiones de cantidades fijas riesgosas, acuerdos a largo plazo ó incluso tener que salir de sus oficinas centrales.

Asimismo la Oficina Virtual hace factible continuar con las actividades laborales, tanto por parte del empleado como de la empresa en todo momento, ya que existen situaciones que no permiten asistir al lugar de trabajo, como enfermedades, tráfico u algún otro inconveniente.

Una Oficina Virtual de Regus incluye servicios de mensajes, un operador para recibir a los clientes en su lenguaje local, y una dirección de negocios de clase mundial. Cuando se requiere de la presencia física, el cliente de la Oficina Virtual tiene acceso a oficinas, salas de juntas, salas de negocios y estudios de Videoconferencias. Esta opción es útil cuando necesitan reunirse con clientes en un ambiente profesional; mejorando la credibilidad, imagen y servicio. Una vez que la viabilidad del mercado ha sido establecida, la compañía puede optar por una oficina de tiempo completo.

La visibilidad global ofrecida por una Oficina Virtual es vital para cualquier compañía que necesita entrar en un nuevo mercado. “Al usar una Oficina Virtual, las firmas pueden dar seguimiento a oportunidades de negocios y alcanzar nuevos clientes en ciudades que tal vez no hayan considerado, ya sea en un Mercado que este justo en el mismo país donde se opera o al otro lado del mundo”, finalizó Cerda.

Les comparto un artículo de William C. Taylor @ fastcompany.com

Internet marketing pioneer Seth Godin says he wants to change the way almost everything is marketed to almost everybody. Will you give him permission to come in and show you the future?

Seth Godin’s company, Yoyodyne Entertainment, is all about fun and games. But its mission is serious business. Godin and his colleagues are working to persuade some of the most powerful companies in the world to reinvent how they relate to their customers. His argument is as stark as it is radical: Advertising just doesn’t work as well as it used to – in part because there’s so much of it, in part because people have learned to ignore it, in part because the rise of the Net means that companies can go beyond it. «We are entering an era,» Godin declares, «that’s going to change the way almost everything is marketed to almost everybody.»

The biggest problem with mass-market advertising, Godin says, is that it fights for people’s attention by interrupting them. A 30-second spot interrupts a «Seinfeld» episode. A telemarketing call interrupts a family dinner. A print ad interrupts this article. «The interruption model is extremely effective when there’s not an overflow of interruptions,» Godin says. «But there’s too much going on in our lives for us to enjoy being interrupted anymore.»

The new model, he argues, is built around permission. The challenge for marketers is to persuade consumers to volunteer attention – to «raise their hands» (one of Godin’s favorite phrases) – to agree to learn more about a company and its products. «Permission marketing turns strangers into friends and friends into loyal customers,» he says. «It’s not just about entertainment – it’s about education.»

Yoyodyne, headquartered outside New York City, works with clients – which include AT&T, H&R Block, MCI, and Volvo – to create these new relationships. All of its campaigns use the Web, email, and other online media. All of them are built around game shows, contests, or sweepstakes. What do game shows have to do with permission marketing? Consumers give a company permission to send them messages in return for the chance to win prizes they care about. «The first rule of permission marketing is that it’s based on selfishness,» Godin says. «Consumers will grant a company permission to communicate only if they know what’s in it for them.»

Yoyodyne’s techniques are catching on. The company has about 1 million active participants in its games database. It has sent more than 110 million email messages to influence consumer behavior. And it receives more email than any other company in the world. (Online services such as AOL handle more traffic, but those messages are destined for subscribers, not for the company itself.) More important, Yoyodyne’s ideas are catching on. In an interview with Fast Company, Seth Godin described the future of marketing – and how your company can get there.

You’ve got a radical critique of conventional marketing. Why should companies listen?

We are entering an era that’s going to change the way almost everything is marketed to almost everybody. Don’t get me wrong. Advertising will remain a competitive weapon. Companies that advertise better will do better than companies that advertise worse. But advertising simply doesn’t work as well as it used to. Do me a favor and finish this sentence: «Winston tastes good . . .»

«. . . like a cigarette should.»

Do you realize that the last time that commercial aired was almost 30 years ago? If you want to build a slogan like that today, if you want to burn a message into people’s brains, it costs huge amounts of money. Companies spent $175 billion on «advertising» in 1996. But 42% of that money went into things like direct mail, not into what we traditionally mean by advertising. That’s because marketers are desperate for better results in a world where the old tools are becoming more expensive and less effective.

What’s different today from 30 years ago?

Marketing is a contest for people’s attention. Thirty years ago, people gave you their attention if you simply asked for it. You’d interrupt their TV program, and they’d listen to what you had to say. You’d put a billboard on the highway, and they’d look at it. That’s not true anymore. This year, the average consumer will see or hear 1 million marketing messages – that’s almost 3,000 per day. No human being can pay attention to 3,000 messages every day.

The interruption model is extremely effective when there’s not an overflow of interruptions. If you tap someone on the shoulder at church, you’re going to get that person’s attention. But there’s too much going on in our lives for us to enjoy being interrupted anymore. So our natural response is to ignore the interruptions.

Television is unbelievably cluttered. Can you recall one TV commercial you saw last night? The Web is even worse! There are more than 250 million people in the United States, and almost all of them watch TV. And maybe 10 channels really matter. That’s 25 million people per channel. There are 45 million people with Web access and 1.5 million commercial sites that are vying for their attention. That’s only 30 people per site. The economics just don’t work.